Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355536›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2024

Ultrasounds outperform magnetic resonance imaging in quantifying meniscal extrusion in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Fabio Tortorella, Angelo Boffa, Luca Andriolo, Giancarlo Facchini, Maddalena Di Carlo, Marco Miceli, Burt Klos, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giuseppe Filardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fabio TortorellaApplied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Angelo BoffaClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1523-6900
Luca AndrioloClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Giancarlo FacchiniRadiologia diagnostica ed interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Maddalena Di CarloRadiologia diagnostica ed interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Marco MiceliRadiologia diagnostica ed interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Burt KlosICONE Orthopedics and Sports Traumatology Schijndel The Netherlands.
Stefano ZaffagniniClinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.
Giuseppe FilardoApplied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to quantify meniscal extrusion through ultrasound (US) evaluation in supine and standing positions and to compare the results with those documented through magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: Sixty patients (38 men, 22 women, mean age 60.8 ± 9.7 years) with knee OA were enrolled and underwent a 1.5 T MR evaluation and an US examination of the symptomatic OA knee for the evaluation of the medial and lateral meniscus extrusion both in the supine clinostatic position (clino-US) with the knee fully extended and in the standing weight-bearing orthostatic position (ortho-US). For the three imaging evaluations (MR, clino-US and ortho-US), both semi-quantitative and quantitative measurements were performed. Results: The quantitative analysis documented higher values of medial meniscal extrusion at the ortho-US evaluation (5.2 ± 2.3 mm) compared to MR (4.2 ± 2.2, Conclusion: US outperforms MR imaging in quantifying meniscal extrusion in patients with knee OA. Moreover, the highest values of meniscal extrusion have been documented using US in standing position compared to the supine position, underlining the importance of the weight-bearing assessment of meniscal extrusion in knee OA patients. Level of Evidence: II.

Indexed as

extrusionmagnetic resonancemeniscusosteoarthritisultrasound

Identifiers

PMID39355536
PMCPMC11442608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.