Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355491›Full record

ArticleCritical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine2024

Natural language processing in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.

Julia K Pilowsky, Jae-Won Choi, Aldo Saavedra, Maysaa Daher, Nhi Nguyen, Linda Williams, Sarah L Jones

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia K PilowskyAgency for Clinical Innovation, NSW Health, Australia.
Jae-Won ChoiAgency for Clinical Innovation, NSW Health, Australia.
Aldo SaavedraAgency for Clinical Innovation, NSW Health, Australia.
Maysaa DaherAgency for Clinical Innovation, NSW Health, Australia.
Nhi NguyenAgency for Clinical Innovation, NSW Health, Australia.
Linda WilliamsAgency for Clinical Innovation, NSW Health, Australia.
Sarah L JonesSt George Hospital, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Natural language processing (NLP) is a branch of artificial intelligence focused on enabling computers to interpret and analyse text-based data. The intensive care specialty is known to generate large volumes of data, including free-text, however, NLP applications are not commonly used either in critical care clinical research or quality improvement projects. This review aims to provide an overview of how NLP has been used in the intensive care specialty and promote an understanding of NLP's potential future clinical applications. Design: Scoping review. Data sources: A systematic search was developed with an information specialist and deployed on the PubMed electronic journal database. Results were restricted to the last 10 years to ensure currency. Review methods: Screening and data extraction were undertaken by two independent reviewers, with any disagreements resolved by a third. Given the heterogeneity of the eligible articles, a narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: Eighty-seven eligible articles were included in the review. The most common type (n = 24) were studies that used NLP-derived features to predict clinical outcomes, most commonly mortality (n = 16). Next were articles that used NLP to identify a specific concept (n = 23), including sepsis, family visitation and mental health disorders. Most studies only described the development and internal validation of their algorithm (n = 79), and only one reported the implementation of an algorithm in a clinical setting. Conclusions: Natural language processing has been used for a variety of purposes in the ICU context. Increasing awareness of these techniques amongst clinicians may lead to more clinically relevant algorithms being developed and implemented.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceIntensive care medicineNatural language processingScoping review

Identifiers

PMID39355491
PMCPMC11440058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.