ReviewCureus2024
Evolving Radiological Approaches in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Arachnoiditis Ossificans.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arachnoiditis ossificans (AO) is a rare and complex neurological condition characterized by pathological calcification or ossification of the arachnoid membrane. Arachnoiditis ranks as the third most frequent cause of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). This narrative review explores the evolving radiological approaches in its diagnosis and monitoring. The historical perspective traces the progression from plain radiographs to advanced imaging techniques. Current radiological modalities, including X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are discussed, highlighting their respective roles, advantages, and limitations. Emerging and advanced imaging modalities, such as high-resolution CT, 3T and 7T MRI, and PET/CT or PET/MRI, are examined for their potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy and monitoring capabilities. A comparative analysis of these imaging modalities considers their sensitivity, specificity, cost-effectiveness, and radiation exposure implications. The review also explores the crucial role of imaging in disease monitoring and treatment planning, including follow-up protocols, evaluation of disease progression, and guidance for interventional procedures. Future directions in the field are discussed, focusing on promising research areas, the potential of artificial intelligence and machine learning in image analysis, and identified gaps in current knowledge. The review emphasizes the importance of a multimodal imaging approach and the need for standardized protocols. It concludes that while significant advancements have been made, further research is necessary to fully understand the correlation between imaging findings and clinical outcomes. The continued evolution of radiological approaches is expected to significantly improve patient care and outcomes in AO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.