ArticleCureus2024
Intraoperative Incidental Finding of Meckel's Diverticulum: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meckel's diverticulum (MD), a prevalent congenital gastrointestinal anomaly affecting about 2% of the population, arises from the incomplete closure of the vitelline duct. It encompasses all layers of the small intestine and can lead to various complications like obstruction, hemorrhage, and perforation. When symptomatic, it presents challenges in diagnosis due to the low sensitivity of imaging techniques. Comprehensive understanding and accurate diagnosis are crucial for managing the complications associated with MD and forming the scientific rationale for publishing this case report. We present two cases, one of them being the case of a 73-year-old male who presented for an ileostomy closure procedure. Intra-operatively, a 4.5 cm diverticulum was identified 10 cm from the stomatal opening on the efferent limb. This finding led to segmental resection of the intestines. Later, pathology was compatible with MD, which didn't contain any malignant cells or heterotopic tissue. The second case was that of a 40-year-old female who presented for severe abdominal pain, abdominal distention, and obstipation for two days. Radiographic imaging was suspicious of a foreign object compatible with fish bone with local inflammation in the small bowel. Laparoscopic exploration showed an inflamed MD with fish bone lodged inside. In front of an incidental MD, the decision to resect is still controversial. Those who are against resection of uncomplicated believe that complications from resecting an uncomplicated MD are higher than the complications that arise if resection is not performed. Those who support resection say that the complications that arise following the resection of a complicated MD are worse than those after resecting an incidental one. Criteria have been put in place to help guide the decision for resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.