Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355447›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Neural correlates of motor learning: Network communication versus local oscillations.

Anaïs Mottaz, Branislav Savic, Leslie Allaman, Adrian G Guggisberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anaïs MottazDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Branislav SavicDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5912-2438
Leslie AllamanDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Adrian G GuggisbergDivision of Neurorehabilitation, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University Hospital of Geneva, University of Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7178-7793

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning new motor skills through training, also termed motor learning, is central for everyday life. Current training strategies recommend intensive task-repetitions aimed at inducing local activation of motor areas, associated with changes in oscillation amplitudes ("event-related power") during training. More recently, another neural mechanism was suggested to influence motor learning: modulation of functional connectivity (FC), that is, how much spatially separated brain regions communicate with each other before and during training. The goal of the present study was to compare the impact of these two neural processing types on motor learning. We measured EEG before, during, and after a finger-tapping task (FTT) in 20 healthy subjects. The results showed that training gain, long-term expertise (i.e., average motor performance), and consolidation were all predicted by whole-brain alpha- and beta-band FC at motor areas, striatum, and mediotemporal lobe (MTL). Local power changes during training did not predict any dependent variable. Thus, network dynamics seem more crucial than local activity for motor sequence learning, and training techniques should attempt to facilitate network interactions rather than local cortical activation.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyFunctional connectivityMotor sequence learningNeural plasticity

Identifiers

PMID39355447
PMCPMC11340994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.