Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355443›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Network-level enrichment provides a framework for biological interpretation of machine learning results.

Jiaqi Li, Ari Segel, Xinyang Feng, Jiaxin Cindy Tu, Andy Eck, Kelsey T King, Babatunde Adeyemo, Nicole R Karcher, Likai Chen, Adam T Eggebrecht and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Hierarchical communities in the larvalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiaqi LiDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ari SegelMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Xinyang FengDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jiaxin Cindy TuMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Andy EckMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kelsey T KingMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Babatunde AdeyemoDepartment of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Nicole R KarcherDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Likai ChenDepartment of Statistics and Data Science, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Adam T EggebrechtMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
Muriah D WheelockMallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3409-8777

Funding

Innovative biostatistical approaches to network level analyses of connectome-behavior relationshipsR00EB029343 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELOCK, MURIAH D · 2022 to 2024
$955k
Network level analysis of progressive brain degeneration in autosomal dominant Alzheimer diseaseK99EB029343 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI WHEELOCK, MURIAH D · 2020 to 2021
$484k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB029343NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB029343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning algorithms are increasingly being utilized to identify brain connectivity biomarkers linked to behavioral and clinical outcomes. However, research often prioritizes prediction accuracy at the expense of biological interpretability, and inconsistent implementation of ML methods may hinder model accuracy. To address this, our paper introduces a network-level enrichment approach, which integrates brain system organization in the context of connectome-wide statistical analysis to reveal network-level links between brain connectivity and behavior. To demonstrate the efficacy of this approach, we used linear support vector regression (LSVR) models to examine the relationship between resting-state functional connectivity networks and chronological age. We compared network-level associations based on raw LSVR weights to those produced from the forward and inverse models. Results indicated that not accounting for shared family variance inflated prediction performance, the k-best feature selection via Pearson correlation reduced accuracy and reliability, and raw LSVR model weights produced network-level associations that deviated from the significant brain systems identified by forward and inverse models. Our findings offer crucial insights for applying machine learning to neuroimaging data, emphasizing the value of network enrichment for biological interpretation.

Indexed as

Brain networksFeature selectionFunctional connectivityHCPMachine learningTwins

Identifiers

PMID39355443
PMCPMC11349033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.