Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355438›Full record

ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Individual variability in neural representations of mind-wandering.

Aaron Kucyi, Nathan Anderson, Tiara Bounyarith, David Braun, Lotus Shareef-Trudeau, Isaac Treves, Rodrigo M Braga, Po-Jang Hsieh, Shao-Min Hung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Real-time fMRI-triggered experience-sampling: a proof-of-concept study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Uncovering the embodied dimension of the wandering mind.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Neural Representations of Reward-Related Memories Shift across Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural Sensitivity to the Heartbeat Is Modulated by Fluctuations in Affective Arousal during Spontaneous Thought.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aaron KucyiDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-0028
Nathan AndersonDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tiara BounyarithDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
David BraunDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lotus Shareef-TrudeauDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Isaac TrevesDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences and McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7802-6145
Rodrigo M BragaDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Po-Jang HsiehDepartment of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shao-Min HungWaseda Institute for Advanced Study, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8908-1497

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN THE NEUROSCIENCE OF HUMAN COGNITIONT32NS047987 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Rodrigo M Braga, Christina Maria Zelano · 2006 to 2026
$5.6M
Real-time fMRI for insular cortex brain state-triggered experience samplingR21MH129630 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI KUCYI, AARON · 2023 to 2024
$417k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH129630NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS047987
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mind-wandering is a frequent, daily mental activity, experienced in unique ways in each person. Yet neuroimaging evidence relating mind-wandering to brain activity, for example in the default mode network (DMN), has relied on population- rather than individual-based inferences owing to limited within-person sampling. Here, three densely sampled individuals each reported hundreds of mind-wandering episodes while undergoing multi-session functional magnetic resonance imaging. We found reliable associations between mind-wandering and DMN activation when estimating brain networks within individuals using precision functional mapping. However, the timing of spontaneous DMN activity relative to subjective reports, and the networks beyond DMN that were activated and deactivated during mind-wandering, were distinct across individuals. Connectome-based predictive modeling further revealed idiosyncratic, whole-brain functional connectivity patterns that consistently predicted mind-wandering within individuals but did not fully generalize across individuals. Predictive models of mind-wandering and attention that were derived from larger-scale neuroimaging datasets largely failed when applied to densely sampled individuals, further highlighting the need for personalized models. Our work offers novel evidence for both conserved and variable neural representations of self-reported mind-wandering in different individuals. The previously unrecognized interindividual variations reported here underscore the broader scientific value and potential clinical utility of idiographic approaches to brain-experience associations.

Indexed as

Experience-samplingPrecision functional mappingResting-state fMRISpontaneous thought

Identifiers

PMID39355438
PMCPMC11349032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.