ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Oral swabs as a proxy for direct ruminal microbiome sampling in Holstein dairy cows is correlated with sample color.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a low dose of 3-nitrooxypropanol and a combination of direct-fed microbials on methane emission, oral swab bacterial community, and performance in dairy cows.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2026Article
- The Salivary Microbiota-Host Nexus: Unraveling Opportunities for Non-Invasive Monitoring of Health and Productivity in Farm Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Correlating the oral swab microbial community with milk production metrics in Holstein dairy cows.mSphere · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using oral swabs to collect the remnants of stomach content regurgitation during rumination in dairy cows can replicate up to 70% of the ruminal bacterial community, offering potential for broad-scale population-based studies on the rumen microbiome. The swabs collected from dairy cows often vary widely with respect to sample quality, likely due to several factors such as time of sample collection and cow rumination behavior, which may limit the ability of a given swab to accurately represent the ruminal microbiome. One such factor is the color of the swab, which can vary significantly across different cows. Here, we hypothesize that darker-colored swabs contain more rumen contents, thereby better representing the ruminal bacterial community than lighter-colored swabs. To address this, we collected oral swabs from 402 dairy cows and rumen samples from 13 cannulated cows on a research farm in Wisconsin, United States and subjected them to 16S rRNA sequencing. In addition, given that little is known about the ability of oral swabs to recapitulate the ruminal fungal community, we also conducted ITS sequencing of these samples. To correlate swab color to the microbiota we developed and utilized a novel imaging approach to colorimetrically quantify each swab from a range of light to dark. We found that swabs with increasing darkness scores were significantly associated with increased bacterial alpha diversity (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.