ReviewJournal of lipid and atherosclerosis2024
Mendelian Randomization Studies in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.
Review in Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Coronary Artery Disease Prediction in Korean Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Analysis Involving Cholesterol Efflux Capacity.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Treatment Target Discovery From Vasculo-Protective Phenotypes.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026Review
- The role of IL-6 in atherosclerosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- ABCC4 impairs the clearance of plasma LDL cholesterol through suppressing LDLR expression in the liver.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Implications of Lipoprotein(a) and its Genetic Variants: A Critical Review From the Middle East.JACC. Asia · 2025Review
- HDL-C and Hematologic Malignancies: A Commentary on Cohort Study.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025Article
- 2025: The year in cardiovascular disease - the year of triglyceride lowering therapies. Can we effectively reduce triglyceride-related residual cardiovascular disease and pancreatitis risk?Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Effects of Iron, Copper, Zinc, and Magnesium on Chronic Widespread Pain: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aimed to highlight the pivotal role of Mendelian randomization (MR) in advancing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) research-a field often hindered by the complexities and limitations of traditional studies. MR, which uses genetic variants as instrumental variables, provides a robust mechanism for inferring causality, offering insights untainted by the confounding factors and biases often prevalent in observational and randomized controlled trials. We explored the significant contributions of MR for elucidating the causal relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ASCVD, and analyzed its assumptions and methodological nuances. We discussed issues surrounding instrumental variable selection, pleiotropy, and ethical considerations, in an effort to offer a balanced and insightful analysis. We highlighted the promising integration of MR with emerging technologies and global data sharing, as well as its potential to drive personalized medicine. This review provided a concise yet comprehensive journey into MR's transformative impact on ASCVD research, offering a blend of current insights and challenges, in addition to future prospects. We aimed to serve a valuable resource for those seeking to navigate the intricate pathways of causality and intervention in ASCVD, to aid the development of enhanced understanding and targeted treatment strategies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.