Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355404›Full record

ReviewJournal of lipid and atherosclerosis2024

Mendelian Randomization Studies in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases.

Dai Sik Ko, Yun Hak Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Treatment Target Discovery From Vasculo-Protective Phenotypes.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2026
    Review
  4. The role of IL-6 in atherosclerosis: a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. HDL-C and Hematologic Malignancies: A Commentary on Cohort Study.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dai Sik KoDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Gachon University College of Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8858-4025
Yun Hak KimDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Yangsan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-8266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review aimed to highlight the pivotal role of Mendelian randomization (MR) in advancing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) research-a field often hindered by the complexities and limitations of traditional studies. MR, which uses genetic variants as instrumental variables, provides a robust mechanism for inferring causality, offering insights untainted by the confounding factors and biases often prevalent in observational and randomized controlled trials. We explored the significant contributions of MR for elucidating the causal relationship between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and ASCVD, and analyzed its assumptions and methodological nuances. We discussed issues surrounding instrumental variable selection, pleiotropy, and ethical considerations, in an effort to offer a balanced and insightful analysis. We highlighted the promising integration of MR with emerging technologies and global data sharing, as well as its potential to drive personalized medicine. This review provided a concise yet comprehensive journey into MR's transformative impact on ASCVD research, offering a blend of current insights and challenges, in addition to future prospects. We aimed to serve a valuable resource for those seeking to navigate the intricate pathways of causality and intervention in ASCVD, to aid the development of enhanced understanding and targeted treatment strategies in the future.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisCardiovascular diseaseMendelian randomization analysis

Identifiers

PMID39355404
PMCPMC11439750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.