ReviewNagoya journal of medical science2024
Timing of onset of intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis: a literature review.
Review in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical diagnosis of intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis using clinical symptoms is challenging and should be made carefully, as an incorrect clinical diagnosis can exacerbate surgical bleeding secondary to stopping a clinically indicated blood transfusion. The timing of onset of anaphylaxis to start of transfusion may be the key to correctly diagnosing intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis clinically. However, the reliability of this measure remains unknown. A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to June 29, 2021. No language restriction was applied. Two pairs of review authors independently reviewed intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis cases and extracted data on the timing of onset of anaphylaxis to start of transfusion. A total of 8,918 articles were reviewed, the full texts of 186 articles were assessed, and 20 intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis cases were included in this study. The 20 intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis cases included a precise timing of onset. With nine cases, cardiovascular surgery was the most prevalent, and one case was fatal. Fifteen cases had a timing of onset in minutes, and of those, 14 reported timeframes within 30 minutes of initiation of transfusion (median: 15.5, 5-30 minutes). Almost all cases of intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis occurred within 30 minutes of the transfusion initiation. This timeframe may be helpful in the clinical diagnosis of intraoperative transfusion anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.