ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Head-orienting behaviors during simultaneous speech detection and localization.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural head orientation and spatial hearing with symmetric frontal maskers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Task-optimized models of sensory uncertainty reproduce human confidence judgments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head movement plays a vital role in auditory processing by contributing to spatial awareness and the ability to identify and locate sound sources. Here we investigate head-orienting behaviors using a dual-task experimental paradigm to measure: (a) localization of a speech source; and (b) detection of meaningful speech (numbers), within a complex acoustic background. Ten younger adults with normal hearing and 20 older adults with mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss were evaluated in the free field on two head-movement conditions: (1) head fixed to the front and (2) head moving to a source location; and two context conditions: (1) with audio only or (2) with audio plus visual cues. Head-tracking analyses quantified the target location relative to head location, as well as the peak velocity during head movements. Evaluation of head-orienting behaviors revealed that both groups tended to undershoot the auditory target for targets beyond 60° in azimuth. Listeners with hearing loss had higher head-turn errors than the normal-hearing listeners, even when a visual location cue was provided. Digit detection accuracy was better for the normal-hearing than hearing-loss groups, with a main effect of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). When performing the dual-task paradigm in the most difficult listening environments, participants consistently demonstrated a wait-and-listen head-movement strategy, characterized by a short pause during which they maintained their head orientation and gathered information before orienting to the target location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.