ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Machine learning-based identification of an immunotherapy-related signature to enhance outcomes and immunotherapy responses in melanoma.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- mRNA-based melanoma vaccines targeting gp100 and TRP2 macromolecules.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Plying potency assays for immunotherapy of solid tumors.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Epigenetics of Malignant Melanoma: Mechanisms, Diagnostic Approaches and Therapeutic Applications.Oncology research · 2026Review
- GBP5 as a prognostic biomarker associated with immune cell infiltration, migration and invasion in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
- Toward Personalized Response Monitoring in Melanoma Patients Treated with Immunotherapy and Target Therapy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Research progress in the construction and application of immunotherapy resistance models.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Review
- Serum TNF -α, IL-10 and IL-2 Trajectories and Outcomes in NSCLC and Melanoma Under Anti-PD-1 Therapy: Longitudinal Real-World Evidence from a Single Center.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
- CD39Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Exploring PANoptosis Related Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers and Potential Drugs for Sarcopenia based on Machine Learning and Experimental Validation.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized skin cutaneous melanoma treatment, but response variability due to tumor heterogeneity necessitates robust biomarkers for predicting immunotherapy response. Methods: We used weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA), consensus clustering, and 10 machine learning algorithms to develop the immunotherapy-related gene model (ITRGM) signature. Multi-omics analyses included bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing of melanoma patients, mouse bulk RNA sequencing, and pathology sections of melanoma patients. Results: We identified 66 consensus immunotherapy prognostic genes (CITPGs) using WGCNA and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from two melanoma cohorts. The CITPG-high group showed better prognosis and enriched immune activities. DEGs between CITPG-high and CITPG-low groups in the TCGA-SKCM cohort were analyzed in three additional melanoma cohorts using univariate Cox regression, resulting in 44 consensus genes. Using 101 machine learning algorithm combinations, we constructed the ITRGM signature based on seven model genes. The ITRGM outperformed 37 published signatures in predicting immunotherapy prognosis across the training cohort, three testing cohorts, and a meta-cohort. It effectively stratified patients into high-risk or low-risk groups for immunotherapy response. The low-risk group, with high levels of model genes, correlated with increased immune characteristics such as tumor mutation burden and immune cell infiltration, indicating immune-hot tumors with a better prognosis. The ITRGM's relationship with the tumor immune microenvironment was further validated in our experiments using pathology sections with GBP5, an important model gene, and CD8 IHC analysis. The ITRGM also predicted better immunotherapy response in eight cohorts, including urothelial carcinoma and stomach adenocarcinoma, indicating broad applicability. Conclusions: The ITRGM signature is a stable and robust predictor for stratifying melanoma patients into 'immune-hot' and 'immune-cold' tumors, enhancing prognosis and response to immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.