ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Cell-bound complement activation products in antiphospholipid antibody-positive patients without other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The complement system in autoimmune diseases: pathogenesis, diagnostic markers, and therapeutic strategies.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to analyze complement activation in antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)-positive patients without other systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases, using C3/C4 and cell-bound complement activation products (CB-CAPs) (B-lymphocytes [BC4d], erythrocytes [EC4d], and platelets [PC4d]). Persistently aPL-positive patients with or without aPL-related clinical manifestations (thrombotic APS [TAPS], microvascular APS [MAPS], obstetric APS, thrombocytopenia [TP], and/or hemolytic anemia [HA]) were enrolled in a single center study. Blood and clinical data were collected at baseline; a subgroup of patients completed 6- or 12-month follow-up. At baseline, 4/31 (13%) patients had decreased C3/C4, while 7/29 (24%) had elevated BC4d, 11/33 (33%) EC4d, and 12/32 (38%) PC4d. Based on different aPL profiles, all patients with decreased C3/C4 or elevated BC4d, EC4d, and PC4d had triple aPL or isolated lupus anticoagulant positivity. Based on different aPL clinical phenotypes, the number of patients with strongly positive EC4d and PC4d were proportionally higher in those with MAPS/TP/HA, compared to TAPS or no APS. Compared to baseline, the frequencies of BC4d, EC4d, and PC4d positivity were not significantly different in the subgroup of patients during their 6- or 12-month follow-up. There was a weak correlation between C3/C4 and CB-CAPs, especially for PC4d. In summary, complement activation in aPL-positive patients varies based on aPL profiles and clinical phenotypes. Given the higher percentage of aPL-positive patients with abnormal CB-CAPs, compared to C3/C4, and the poor inverse correlation between CB-CAPs and C3/C4, our study generates the hypothesis that CB-CAPs have a role in assessing disease activity and thrombosis risk in aPL-positive patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.