Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355190›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pediatric dentistry2024

Perceptions of Dental Teachers about Blended Learning: A Qualitative Analysis.

Gauri Lele, Mandira Sikdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gauri LeleDepartment of Liberal Studies and Education, School of Liberal Studies & Education, Navrachana University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5060-7949
Mandira SikdarDepartment of Liberal Studies and Education, School of Liberal Studies & Education, Navrachana University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This qualitative study was conducted to explore the perceptions of dental teachers about utilizing blended learning (BL) in undergraduate teaching following the COVID-19 pandemic. The objectives were to study their willingness to move to BL and to identify the reasons for their willingness or lack thereof for this transition. Materials and methods: This descriptive qualitative study is part of doctoral research that was conducted among health sciences teachers from the state of Maharashtra, India. The population for this study included all dental teachers from the 38 dental colleges in the state. To ensure proper representation of teachers, a proportionate stratified sampling method was used. The research tool used in this study was developed and validated, and data collection was conducted online using SurveyMonkey. Results: The results showed that 137 (97.16%) teachers were inclined toward utilizing BL. Thematic analysis of the responses received was carried out using NVivo software. Around 10 main emergent themes were identified, which were grouped under four key areas. The majority of the dental teachers were appreciative of the benefits of BL in terms of accessibility, flexibility, and learner engagement, but some preferred traditional teaching methods. Conclusion: For the dental teachers to continue with BL in instruction, there is a need to empower them How to cite this article: Lele G, Sikdar M. Perceptions of Dental Teachers about Blended Learning: A Qualitative Analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(5):532-538.

Indexed as

Blended learningDental educationQualitative studyTeacher perception

Identifiers

PMID39355190
PMCPMC11440673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.