ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2024
Combinatorial protection of cochlear hair cells: not too little but not too much.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- EDNRB2 regulates fate, migration, and maturation of hair cell precursors in regenerating avian auditory epithelium explants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A number of drugs are toxic to the cochlear sensory cells known as hair cells (HCs), resulting in hearing loss. Treatment with survival-promoting growth factors, antioxidants, and inhibitors of cell death pathways or proteinases have been shown to reduce HC damage in Methods: Using an Results: Increasing protection of hair cells was observed as combinations of compounds were increased from two to four factors, although not all combinations were equally protective. The optimal combination of four compounds consisted of an anti-oxidant, an apoptosis inhibitor, an autophagy inhibitor and a protective growth factor. Increasing the number of factors to five or six resulted in decreased protection. Conclusion: The results support the hypothesis that targeting multiple cellular damage or survival pathways provides more an effective hair cell protection approach. The results help to identify critical interactions among the cellular processes that operate in gentamicin ototoxicity. They also suggest that inhibiting too many biological processes impairs functions critical to HC survival, resulting in decreased protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.