ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Optimization and application of digital droplet PCR for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimen using commercially available kit.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant global health crisis, causing hundreds of millions of cases and millions of deaths. Despite being declared endemic, SARS-CoV-2 infection continues to pose a significant risk, particularly for immunocompromised individuals, highlighting the need for a more sensitive and specific detection. Reverse transcription digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) possesses a sensitive and absolute quantification compared to the gold standard. This study is the first to optimize RT-ddPCR for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in saliva specimens using a commercially available RT-qPCR kit. Optimization involved the assessment of the RT-ddPCR reaction mixture, annealing temperature adjustments, and validation using 40 stored saliva specimens. RT-qPCR was used as a reference method in this study. Compatibility assessment revealed that ddPCR Supermix for Probes (no dUTP) was preferable with an optimal annealing temperature of 57.6°C. Although a 25% higher primer/probe concentration provides a higher amplitude in droplet separation of positive control, the number of copy numbers decreased. An inverse correlation between Ct value and copy number concentration was displayed, presenting that the lower the Ct value, the higher the concentration, for the N and E genes with r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.