ArticleHealth science reports2024
Efficacy of virtual reality therapy versus pharmacological sedation for reducing pain and anxiety during coronary catheterisation procedures: A prospective randomised controlled trial.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Virtual Reality Is Safe and Can Reduce In-Hospital Anxiety and Pain: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses and Trial Sequence Analyses.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Virtual Reality Distraction for Reducing Pain and Anxiety During Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Virtual reality in percutaneous coronary intervention: from coronary imaging and procedural planning to patient care.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Effect of Virtual Reality on Pain and Anxiety During Epidural Steroid Injection in Patients with Lumbar Radicular Pain: An Open-Label Randomized Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Efficacy of virtual reality therapy versus pharmacological sedation for reducing pain and anxiety during coronary catheterisation procedures: A prospective randomised controlled trial.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The use of virtual reality (VR) therapy has grown considerably, as it is effective for reducing pain and anxiety in different clinical areas. However, it has not been well evaluated for coronary angiography and angioplasty. This study aimed to compare VR therapy with pharmacological sedation (Sedation) for reducing pain in patients undergoing a planned coronary angiography or coronary/peripheral angioplasty. Methods: In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups before catheterization: a Sedation group (injection of midazolam and fentanyl) or a VR group (Deepsen VR headset). The primary outcome measure was the maximum pain during the procedure (visual analogue scale: 0-10). The secondary outcome measures were anxiety following the procedure (Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory: 20-80), the occurrence of arterial spasm, the haemodynamic profile and patient satisfaction. Results: The VR group ( Conclusions: Virtual reality therapy was not non-inferior to pharmacological sedation for reducing pain during coronary angiography or angioplasty. However, it reduced anxiety to a comparable level. Virtual reality therapy represents an alternative to pharmacological sedation, which is well accepted by patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.