ArticleCureus2024
A Study at Wad Madani, Sudan: Are We Documenting Acute Ankle Fractures Effectively?
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Implementation of a New Discharge Card in the Department of Internal Medicine at Atbara Teaching Hospital.Cureus · 2025Article
- Streamlining Patient Transitions: A Surgical Discharge Card Initiative at Almanagil Teaching Hospital.Cureus · 2025Article
- A Structured Approach to Discharge Documentation: Lessons from Dongola Specialized Hospital.Cureus · 2025Article
- Orthopaedic Trauma in Sudan: Delivering Care and Improving Outcomes in a War-Torn System.Orthopedic reviews · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical records are essential documents that outline a patient's medical history and current health status. It involves maintaining records that include assessments of patient outcomes, care plans, and interventions necessary to meet patient needs. A patient's medical record encompasses details about their condition, as documented by healthcare professionals, including clinical assessments, evaluations, and professional opinions related to the delivery of care.
methodsThis retrospective study aimed to evaluate the adequacy of our documentation for acute ankle fractures in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guidelines, encompassing a total of 41 cases. The research was conducted at the Gezira Center for Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology (GCOST) in Wad Madani, Sudan, from May 12 to July 12, 2022.
resultsOf the 41 recorded notes for acute ankle fractures, 26 (63.4%) were documented by medical officers and 15 (36.6%) by orthopaedic trainees. Most fractures (25 cases, 61%) occurred in individuals aged 18-40 years, and the gender distribution showed that males accounted for most fractures, with 29 cases (70.7%). Additionally, all patients (100%) had a documented cause of injury. Skin integrity was noted in 38 patients (92.7%). Vascular examination was documented in 18 patients (43.9%), while neurological examination was recorded in 16 patients (39%).
conclusionAlthough the cause of ankle fractures was reported in all patients, the neurovascular examination was insufficiently documented, compromising patient care and failing to meet national standards, as highlighted in our study. We recommend implementing the BOAST guidelines to ensure proper documentation and essential assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.