Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355052›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nuclear medicine2023

Theranostics in breast cancer.

M Vorster, B P Hadebe, M M Sathekge

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Spiegelmer Aptamers: Innovative Approach in Breast Cancer.Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M VorsterDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
B P HadebeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
M M SathekgeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is a complex disease and constitutes the leading cause of cancer in women globally. Conventional treatment modalities include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and hormonal therapy; all of these have their limitations and often result in significant side effects or toxicity. Targeted radionuclide therapy based on a theranostic approach has been successfully applied in several malignancies, such as prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, and neuro-endocrine tumours. Several studies have also highlighted the potential of theranostic applications in breast cancer. Aim: This review aims to provide an overview of the most promising current and future theranostic approaches in breast cancer. Discussion: The discussion includes pre-clinical as well as clinical data on some of the most successful targets used to date. Examples of potential theranostic approaches include those targeting the Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, angiogenesis, aspects of the tumour microenvironment, Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR), Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and Chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR-4) expression. Several challenges to widespread clinical implementation remain, which include regulatory approval, access to the various radiopharmaceuticals and imaging technology, cost-effectiveness, and the absence of robust clinical data. Conclusion: Theranostic approaches have the potential to greatly improve diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes for patients with breast cancer. More research is needed to fully explore the potential of such approaches and to identify the best potential targets, considering feasibility, costs, efficacy, side effects and outcomes.

Indexed as

breast cancerCXCR4FAPIRLT/radioligand therapytargeted radionuclide therapytheranostics

Identifiers

PMID39355052
PMCPMC11440857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.