ReviewFrontiers in nuclear medicine2023
PET tracers in glioblastoma: Toward neurotheranostics as an individualized medicine approach.
Review in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Revealing the hidden: A systematic review and meta-analysis of FAPI-based tracers imaging for brain metastatic lesions.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Pooled it
- Metabolic Imaging as Future Technology and Innovation in Brain-Tumour Surgery: A Systematic Review.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- PSMA-Targeted Theranostics in Glioblastoma Multiforme: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Cutting-edge approaches in pet imaging for gliomas: current applications for neurooncologists and the path to theranostic breakthroughs.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Review
- Does PARP1 up-regulation correlate with PSMA expression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer studied with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Theranostics in nuclear medicine: the era of precision oncology.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- The determination of the boundaries and prediction the radicality of glioblastoma resection using MRI and CT perfusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Clinical Theranostics in Recurrent Gliomas: A Review.Cancers · 2024Review
- Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- [Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, theragnostic radiopharmaceuticals have been used in nuclear medicine for both diagnosis and treatment of various tumors. In this review, we carried out a literature search to investigate and explain the role of radiotracers in the theragnostic approach to glioblastoma multiform (GBM). We primarily focused on basic and rather common positron emotion tomography (PET) radiotracers in these tumors. Subsequently, we introduced and evaluated the preclinical and clinical results of theranostic-based biomarkers including integrin receptor family, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), fibroblast activated protein (FAP), somatostatin receptors (SRS), and chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) for patients with GBM to confer the benefit of personalized therapy. Moreover, promising research opportunities that could have a profound impact on the treatment of GBM over the next decade are also highlighted. Preliminary results showed the potential feasibility of the theragnostic approach using theses biomarkers in GBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.