Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39355016›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nuclear medicine2023

Multicentric

Robin Gutsche, Gizem Gülmüs, Felix M Mottaghy, Florian Gärtner, Markus Essler, Dirk von Mallek, Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar, Philipp Lohmann, Alexander Heinzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Predictive imaging biomarkers on whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-DWMRI) and [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Future of radiotheranostics.BMJ oncology · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Robin GutscheInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Gizem GülmüsRWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Felix M MottaghyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Florian GärtnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Markus EsslerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Dirk von MallekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Hojjat AhmadzadehfarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Westphalen, Dortmund, Germany.
Philipp Lohmann *Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany.
Alexander Heinzel *Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Juelich, Juelich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The treatment with Methods: A total of 45 mCRPC patients treated with Results: The machine learning model based on a combined radiomic signature of three features and patient age achieved an AUC of 0.82 in 5-fold cross-validation and outperformed models based on age and PET parameters or radiomic features (AUC, 0.75 and 0.76, respectively). A Cox regression model based on this radiomic signature showed the best performance to predict overall survival (C-index, 0.67). Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that a machine learning model to predict response to

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningmetastasesPET/CTprognosis

Identifiers

PMID39355016
PMCPMC11440964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.