Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354970›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nuclear medicine2022

Normal Variants and Pitfalls of

Khushica Purbhoo, Mboyo Di-Tamba Vangu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Whole-Body MRI VersusCancers · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Imaging insights of FDG-PET from neonates to infants.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Diagnostic efficacy of [Discover oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Pleural Uptake Patterns inJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Khushica PurbhooDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mboyo Di-Tamba VanguDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2- deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) is a well-established modality that is used in adult oncologic imaging. Its use in pediatric oncology has increased over time. It enables increased diagnostic accuracy due to the combination of functional and morphologic imaging, resulting in optimal patient management. However, the clinician should be aware that the normal distribution of FDG uptake in children differs from adults. Also, even though FDG is used widely in oncology, it is not tumor specific. Uptake of FDG may be seen in numerous benign conditions, including inflammation, infection, and trauma. Proper interpretation of pediatric FDG PET/CT studies requires knowledge of the normal distribution of FDG uptake in children, and an insight into the physiologic variants, benign lesions, and PET/CT related artifacts. Understanding the potential causes of misinterpretation increases the confidence of image interpretation, reduce the number of unnecessary follow-up studies, optimize treatment and more importantly, reduce the radiation exposure to the patient. We review and discuss the physiological distribution of FDG uptake in children, the variation in distribution, lesions that are benign that could be misinterpreted as malignancy, and the various artifacts associated with PET/CT performed in pediatric oncology patients. We add a pictorial illustration to prompt understanding and familiarity of the above-mentioned patterns. Therefore, we believe that this review will assist in reducing possible mistakes by reading physicians and prevent incorrect interpretation.

Indexed as

18F-FDG PET/CTnormal variantoncologypediatric nuclear medicinephysiological

Identifiers

PMID39354970
PMCPMC11440973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.