ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2024
An evaluation of support to the second victims in Tshwane District Health Services, South Africa.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of the patient safety incident guideline in district health services, Western Cape.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInitiatives to reduce patient safety incidents (PSI) and support healthcare professionals who may experience psychological trauma as a result are becoming increasingly common. However, little is known about the quality of the support provided by Tshwane District Health Services. Therefore, it is necessary to assess their assistance for the second victims in order to evaluate their effectiveness.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted, and 319 healthcare professionals from six primary health care institutions were invited to participate in the study. The sociodemographic information, work experience, emotional support, familiarity with the concept of the 'second victim' and involvement with PSIs were collected.
resultsThe mean age was 39.8 years, ranging from 22 years to 66 years. The majority of participants were females (n = 249; 78.1%), nurses (n = 153; 49.2%), and those with 5-9 years of experience (n = 82; 25.8%). Most participants (n = 168; 52.7%) were aware of the possibilities of emotional support, while less than half (n = 142; 44.5%) were familiar with the term 'second victim'. The cumulative incidence of adverse events in the institutions was 19.4%, and the majority of second victims (n = 39; 62.9%) emotionally felt the need to speak with someone about it, preferably outside of the workplace. Less than 5% of individuals received support that was initiated by existing structures at their workplace.
conclusionFrameworks exist to assist second victims, although they are only known to some healthcare professionals. However, their current use in Tshwane health facilities is ineffective. After experiencing PSIs, second victims often rely on psychological assistance outside of the workplace.Contribution: Authorities need to determine the causes behind some healthcare professionals' lack of awareness regarding the support framework for second victims, as well as their growing tendency to rely on psychologists outside of the workplace, and corrective measures should be implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.