Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354657›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2024

Development of the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool and assessment process to benchmark the implementation of local government policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.

Oriana Ruffini, Chanel Relf, Davina Mann, Miranda R Blake, Amy Carrad, Belinda Reeve, Liza Barbour, Lana Vanderlee, Stefanie Vandevijvere, Gary Sacks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mapping the Healthiness of Community Food Environments and Their Association With the Socioeconomic Index for Areas (SEIFA) in the South Coast of NSW.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Oriana RuffiniGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8813-0031
Chanel RelfCity of Greater Bendigo, Bendigo, VIC, Australia.
Davina MannNational Health and Medical Research Council, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Miranda R BlakeGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-2320
Amy CarradAustralian Research Centre for Health Equity, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Belinda ReeveThe University of Sydney Law School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Liza BarbourDepartment of Nutrition, Dietetics & Food, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1047-4691
Lana VanderleeSchool of Nutrition, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5384-1821
Stefanie VandevijvereDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Gary SacksGlobal Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9736-1539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLocal governments have an important role to play in creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems. This study aimed to develop and pilot a tool and process for local governments in Australia to benchmark their policies for creating healthy, equitable and environmentally sustainable food systems.

designThe Healthy Food Environment Policy Index (Food-EPI), developed in 2013 for national governments, was tailored to develop the Local Food Systems Policy Index (Local Food-EPI+) tool for local governments. To incorporate environmental sustainability and the local government context, this process involved a literature review and collaboration with an international and domestic expert advisory committee (

settingLocal governments.

resultsThe tool consists of sixty-one indicators across ten food policy domains (weighted based on relative importance): leadership; governance; funding and resources; monitoring and intelligence; food production and supply chain; food promotion; food provision and retail in public facilities and spaces; supermarkets and food sources in the community; food waste reuse, redistribution and reduction; and support for communities. Pilot implementation of the tool in one local government demonstrated that the assessment process was feasible and likely to be helpful in guiding policy implementation.

conclusionThe Local Food-EPI+ tool and assessment process offer a comprehensive mechanism to assist local governments in benchmarking their actions to improve the healthiness, equity and environmental sustainability of food systems and prioritise action areas. Broad use of this tool will identify and promote leading practices, increase accountability for action and build capacity and collaborations.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingFood SupplyLocal GovernmentNutrition PolicyAustraliaDiet, HealthyHumansPilot ProjectsSustainable DevelopmentAssessmentAustraliaBenchmarkingCouncilEnvironmental sustainabilityEquityFood environmentsFood systemsLocal governmentPlanetary healthPolicyTool

Identifiers

PMID39354657
PMCPMC11504496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.