ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Evaluating the predictive efficacy of real-time 3D echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to assess the predictive efficacy of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) and QRS wave duration in determining the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and assessing left ventricular systolic function pre- and post-CRT device implantation.
methodA total of 51 patients with heart failure undergoing CRT at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University between January 1, 2013, and October 31, 2020, were enrolled in this study. Traditional two-dimensional echocardiography and RT-3DE were performed pre and post-CRT, with QRS wave width data from electrocardiograms and additional clinical information collected. Patients were categorized into CRT responder (n = 36) and CRT non-responder (n = 15) groups based on their response to CRT device implantation. Comparative analyses were conducted on the general characteristics of both groups, as well as the predictive efficacy of RT-3DE and QRS wave width for CRT responsiveness and left ventricular systolic function. Data on the standard deviation (Tmsv16-SD, Tmsv12-SD, Tmsv6-SD) and maximum difference (Tmsv16-Dif, Tmsv12-Dif, Tmsv6-Dif) of left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) at segments 16, 12, and 6, as well as QRS wave width, were collected and analyzed.
resultsThe indicators Tmsv6-Dif, Tmsv12-Dif, Tmsv16-Dif, Tmsv6-SD, Tmsv12-SD, Tmsv16-SD, and QRS wave width exhibited significantly higher values in the CRT responder group when compared to the CRT non-responder group (P < 0.05). Among these, Tmsv16-SD demonstrated superior predictive performance for post-CRT response, with a sensitivity of 88.9%, specificity of 80.0%, and a diagnostic cut-off value of 6.19%. This predictive capability exceeded that of the conventional indicator, QRS wave width.
conclusionRT-3DE enables accurate prediction of post-CRT patient response and significantly facilitates quantitative assessment of CRT therapy efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.