ArticleBMC medical education2024
Exploring the improvement path of virtual simulation experiments: based on the influencing factors and mediating effects of learning satisfaction.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVirtual simulation experiment is a vital component of higher education digitalization, emerging from the deep integration of specialty disciplines and information technology. Chinese universities have invested heavily in the construction of virtual simulation experiment projects, and the number of projects is considerably large. However, the popularity and effectiveness of these projects are not satisfactory. As an important index to measure the teaching quality, analyzing the influencing factors and mediating effects of learning satisfaction of virtual simulation experiment is an effective entry point to improve the quality and efficiency of virtual simulation experiment teaching and improve the learning effect.
methodsThis study used quantitative research methods. The research sample includes 538 students from various levels of higher education institutions such as Nanjing University, Nantong University, Nanjing Medical University, and Jiangsu University, covering 11 majors. They started to study the virtual simulation experiment course for one academic year in September 2023 and conducted a questionnaire survey at the end of the course. The questionnaire survey involved four aspects, mainly from the student dimension, course dimension, the technical dimension, and the embodied dimension to evaluate the learning satisfaction of the virtual simulation experiment course. The data were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS.
resultsAccording to the results of the structural equation modeling (SEM), all of the student dimension (learning motivation {β = 0.658,p < 0.001} and task value {β = 0.339,p < 0.001}), course dimension (course content {β = 0.275,p < 0.001}, course flexibility {β = 0.052,p < 0.002}, and course quality {β = 0.635,p < 0.001}), technical dimension (interface design {β = 0.445,p < 0.001}, interaction design {β = 0.151,p < 0.001}, technical adaptability {β = 0.225,p < 0.001}, and technical reliability y{β = 0.140,p < 0.001}), and embodied dimension (social presence {β = 0.270,p < 0.001} and spatial presence {β = 0.689,p < 0.001}) have positive effects on improving the learning satisfaction of virtual simulation experiments. Meanwhile, the technical dimension exhibited a mediating effect in the influence of embodied dimension on learning satisfaction.
conclusionsTo enhance the learning effectiveness of virtual simulation experiments, we can put forward the strategies from four dimensions including students, course, technical, and embodied to specifically address learning satisfaction. This approach would provide directional guidance for the development of medical virtual simulation experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.