ArticleBMC research notes2024
Comparison of Epstein-Barr virus copy number in white blood cells of chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients with laboratory prognostic biomarker.
Article in BMC research notes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveThe DNA load of EBV may play a part in CLL pathogenesis and prognosis. The objective of this cross-sectional study was to examine the prognostic value of EBV viral load in CLL patients in comparison with other common laboratory prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsWhole blood and sera from forty untreated CLL patients were collected. Next, DNA was extracted from total white blood cells (WBC), and TaqMan real-time PCR was performed to determine the EBV-DNA load by amplifying a specific fragment in the BNRF1 gene. In addition, parameters such as complete blood counts (CBC) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were determined using an automated clinical laboratory analyzer.
resultsTwenty-one patients (52.5%) were positive for EBV by real-time PCR analysis (ranged 20 to 30000 copies/µL). The difference in LDH mean levels between EBV positive and negative patients was marginally significant (P = 0.05). Furthermore, platelet (PLT) count (P = 0.03) and CD5
conclusionThe EBV-DNA load could be used as a prognostic factor in the initial examination of CLL patients to better characterize the disease outcome and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.