ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024
Predicting the survival of patients with painful tumours treated with palliative radiotherapy: a secondary analysis using the 3-variable number-of-risk-factors model.
Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- End-of-life prognostic models in advanced cancer: a scoping review of model development, validation, and impact.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Prognostic Models for Patient Selection in Palliative Bone Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 3-variable number-of-risk-factors (NRF) model is a prognostic tool for patients undergoing palliative radiotherapy (PRT). However, there is little research on the NRF model for patients with painful non-bone-metastasis tumours treated with PRT, and the efficacy of the NRF model in predicting survival is unclear to date. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prognostic accuracy of a 3-variable NRF model in patients undergoing PRT for bone and non- bone-metastasis tumours.
methodsThis was a secondary analysis of studies on PRT for bone-metastasis (BM) and PRT for miscellaneous painful tumours (MPTs), including non-BM tumours. Patients were grouped in the NRF model and survival was compared between groups. Discrimination was evaluated using a time-independent C-index and a time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). A calibration curve was used to assess the agreement between predicted and observed survival.
resultsWe analysed 485 patients in the BM group and 302 patients in the MPT group. The median survival times in the BM group for groups I, II, and III were 35.1, 10.1, and 3.3 months, respectively (P < 0.001), while in the MPT group, they were 22.1, 9.5, and 4.6 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The C-index was 0.689 in the BM group and 0.625 in the MPT group. In the BM group, time-dependent AUROCs over 2 to 24 months ranged from 0.738 to 0.765, while in the MPT group, they ranged from 0.650 to 0.689, with both groups showing consistent accuracy over time. The calibration curve showed a reasonable agreement between the predicted and observed survival.
conclusionsThe NRF model predicted survival moderately well in both the BM and MPT groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.