ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Optimized polycystic ovarian disease prognosis and classification using AI based computational approaches on multi-modality data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Machine learning and deep learning for diagnosis of Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence in polycystic ovarian syndrome management: past, present, and future.La Radiologia medica · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of deep learning models on ultrasound images for distinguishing benign from malignant ovarian cysts.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Article
- AutoPCOS: a stepwise multimodal intelligent framework for polycystic ovary syndrome risk stratification and diagnostic support.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) management using a nutrition recommender mobile application: identifying key requirements.BMC women's health · 2025Article
- Harnessing Microbiome, Bacterial Extracellular Vesicle, and Artificial Intelligence for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis and Management.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Automated high precision PCOS detection through a segment anything model on super resolution ultrasound ovary images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advancement in early diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: biomarker-driven innovative diagnostic sensor.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Female Infertility Diagnosis: An Update.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polycystic Ovarian Disease or Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is becoming increasingly communal among women, owing to poor lifestyle choices. According to the research conducted by National Institutes of Health, it has been observe that PCOS, an endocrine condition common in women of childbearing age, has become a significant contributing factor to infertility. Ovarian abnormalities brought on by PCOS carry a high risk of miscarriage, infertility, cardiac problems, diabetes, uterine cancer, etc. Ovarian cysts, obesity, menstrual irregularities, elevated amounts of male hormones, acne vulgaris, hair loss, and hirsutism are some of the symptoms of PCOS. It is not easy to determine PCOS because of its different combinations of symptoms in different women and various criteria needed for diagnosis. Taking biochemical tests and ovary scanning is a time-consuming process and the financial expenses have become a hardship to the patients. Thus, early prognosis of PCOS is crucial to avoid infertility. The goal of the proposed work is to analyse PCOS symptoms based on clinical data for early diagnosis and to classify into PCOS affected or not. To achieve this objective, clinical features dataset and ultrasound imaging dataset from Kaggle is utilized. Initially 541 instances of 45 clinical features such as testosterone, hirsutism, family history, BMI, fast food, menstrual disorder, risk etc. are considered and correlation-based feature extraction method is applied to this dataset which results in 17 features. The extracted features are applied to various machine learning algorithms such as Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine. The performance of each method is evaluated based on accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score and the result shows that among three models, Support Vector Machine model achieved high accuracy of 94.44%. In addition to this, 3856 ultrasound images are analysed by CNN based deep learning algorithm and VGG16 transfer learning algorithm. The performance of these models is evaluated using training accuracy, loss and validation accuracy, loss and the result depicts that VGG16 outperforms than CNN model with validation accuracy of 98.29%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.