ArticleBMC surgery2024
Developing a nomogram to predict recurrent intussusception after pneumatic reduction of primary intussusception in children.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biomarker-Based Prediction of Treatment Outcomes in Pediatric Intussusception: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A vision transformer deep learning model for assessing pediatric ileocolic intussusception severity using ultrasound images.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pediatric Intussusception-A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic enema reduction for recurrent intussusception in children: a retrospective analysis of 215 cases.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroudIntussusception is a common acute abdominal disease in children, often leading to acute ileus in infants and young children.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a nomogram for predicting recurrent intussusception in children within 48 h after pneumatic reduction of primary intussusception.
methodsClinical data of children with acute intussusception admitted to multiple hospitals from March 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The children were divided into a successful reductioncontrol group (control group) and a recurrent intussusception group (RI group) according to the results of pneumatic reduction.
resultsA total of 2406 cases were included in this study, including 2198 control group and 208 RI group. In the total sample, 1684 cases were trained and 722 cases were verified. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to establish a predictive model based on age, abdominal pain time, white blood cells count, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels as independent predictors of intussusception recurrence. The nomogram successfully predicted recurrent intussusception after pneumatic reduction.
conclusionIn this study, a nomogram was developed based on clinical risk factors to predict recurrent intussusception following pneumatic reduction in children. Age, abdominal pain time, white blood cell counts, and hypersensitive C-reactive protein levels were identified as predictors and incorporated into the nomogram. Internal validation demonstrated that this nomogram can offer a clear and convenient tool for identifying risk factors for recurrence of intussusception in children undergoing pneumatic reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.