Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354470›Full record

SynthesisHealth research policy and systems2024

Understanding healthcare professionals' responses to patient complaints in secondary and tertiary care in the UK: A systematic review and behavioural analysis using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Vivi Antonopoulou, Carly Meyer, Paul Chadwick, Beckie Gibson, Falko F Sniehotta, Ivo Vlaev, Anna Vassova, Louis Goffe, Fabiana Lorencatto, Alison McKinlay and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health research policy and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Iran Healthcare Professionals' Charter of Rights.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Vivi AntonopoulouCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK. v.antonopoulou@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-4191
Carly MeyerCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Paul ChadwickCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Beckie GibsonNIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) in Behavioural and Social Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Falko F SniehottaNIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) in Behavioural and Social Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Ivo VlaevNIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) in Behavioural and Social Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Anna VassovaCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Louis GoffeNIHR Policy Research Unit (PRU) in Behavioural and Social Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK.
Fabiana LorencattoCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Alison McKinlayCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.
Angel Marie ChaterCentre for Behaviour Change (CBC), Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research PR-PRU1217-20501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe path of a complaint and patient satisfaction with complaint resolution is often dependent on the responses of healthcare professionals (HCPs). It is therefore important to understand the influences shaping HCP behaviour. This systematic review aimed to (1) identify the key actors, behaviours and factors influencing HCPs' responses to complaints, and (2) apply behavioural science frameworks to classify these influences and provide recommendations for more effective complaints handling behaviours.

methodsA systematic literature review of UK published and unpublished (so-called grey literature) studies was conducted (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022301980). Five electronic databases [Scopus, MEDLINE/Ovid, Embase, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and Health Management Information Consortium (HMIC)] were searched up to September 2021. Eligibility criteria included studies reporting primary data, conducted in secondary and tertiary care, written in English and published between 2001 and 2021 (studies from primary care, mental health, forensic, paediatric or dental care services were excluded). Extracted data included study characteristics, participant quotations from qualitative studies, results from questionnaire and survey studies, case studies reported in commentaries and descriptions, and summaries of results from reports. Data were synthesized narratively using inductive thematic analysis, followed by deductive mapping to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

resultsIn all, 22 articles and three reports met the inclusion criteria. A total of 8 actors, 22 behaviours and 24 influences on behaviour were found. Key factors influencing effective handling of complaints included HCPs' knowledge of procedures, communication skills and training, available time and resources, inherent contradictions within the role, role authority, HCPs' beliefs about their ability to handle complaints, beliefs about the value of complaints, managerial and peer support and organizational culture and emotions. Themes mapped onto nine TDF domains: knowledge, skills, environmental context and resources, social/professional role and identity, social influences, beliefs about capability, intentions and beliefs about consequences and emotions. Recommendations were generated using the Behaviour Change Wheel approach.

conclusionsThrough the application of behavioural science, we identified a wide range of individual, social/organizational and environmental influences on complaints handling. Our behavioural analysis informed recommendations for future intervention strategies, with particular emphasis on reframing and building on the positive aspects of complaints as an underutilized source of feedback at an individual and organizational level.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelPatient SatisfactionSecondary Health CareCommunicationHumansProfessional-Patient RelationsTertiary Health CareUnited KingdomBehavioural responseComplaintsPatient safetyQuality of healthcareSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39354470
PMCPMC11443808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.