ArticleBMC pediatrics2024
Maternal exposure to smoking and wheezing phenotypes in children: a cohort study of the Japan Environment and Children's Study.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early-Life Environmental Determinants of Allergic Conditions in Children with Atopic Heredity: A Single Center Cross-Sectional Study from Bulgaria.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies have shown that prenatal maternal smoking and maternal secondhand smoke exposure during pregnancy were associated with an increased risk of wheezing and asthma development. However, few studies have examined the influence of different sources of tobacco exposure in different perinatal timeframes (preconception, prenatal, and postnatal) on wheezing phenotypes in children. Using national survey data from Japan, we investigated the effects of exposure to tobacco smoke during pregnancy on wheezing phenotypes in children before the age of 3 years.
methodsPregnant women who lived in the 15 regional centers in the Japan Environment and Children's Study were recruited. We obtained information on prenatal and postnatal exposure to active and secondhand smoke (SHS) and wheeze development up to 3 years of age. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the association between tobacco smoke exposure and wheezing phenotypes in children.
resultsWe analyzed 73,057 singleton births and identified four longitudinal wheezing phenotypes: never wheezing; early transient wheezing (wheezing by age 1 year but not thereafter); late-onset wheezing (wheezing by age 2-3 years but not beforehand); and persistent wheezing. Maternal smoking during pregnancy was significantly associated with early transient and persistent wheezing in children compared with no maternal smoking [early transient wheezing: 1-10 cigarettes per day, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.66; ≥ 11 cigarettes per day, aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.27-2.20; persistent wheezing: 1-10 cigarettes per day, aOR 1.64, 95% CI 1.37-1.97; ≥ 11 cigarettes per day, aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.70-3.19]. Smoking cessation even before pregnancy was also significantly associated with increased risk of early transient wheezing, late-onset wheezing, and persistent wheezing in children. Moreover, maternal exposure to SHS during pregnancy was significantly associated with increased risk of early transient and persistent wheezing compared with no such exposure.
conclusionsMaternal smoking before and throughout pregnancy was associated with wheeze development in children up to 3 years of age. It appears that smoking is detrimental compared to never smoking, regardless of whether individuals quit smoking before or after becoming aware of the pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.