Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354354›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Association between heart rate and mortality in patients with septic shock: an analysis revealed by time series data.

Yi-Le Ning, Wen-Jia Li, Xiang Lu, Yu Zhang, Jun-Wei Zhang, Ji-Hong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Differential Mortality Benefit of Beta-blockers in Septic Shock: A Subgroup Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yi-Le Ning *Shenzhen Bao'an Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Wen-Jia Li *Shenzhen Bao'an Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Xiang LuShenzhen Bao'an Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Yu ZhangShenzhen Bao'an Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China. zhangyu801026@qq.com.
Jun-Wei ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, North China University of Science and Technology Affiliated Hospital, Tangshan, China. zjw6066@hotmail.com.
Ji-Hong ZhouShenzhen Bao'an Chinese Medicine Hospital, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China. zhoujihong71@gzucm.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeart rate is crucial for patients with septic shock, but there are few studies on the scope of heart rate. Therefore, we studied the relationship between different heart rates and mortality of critically ill patients with septic shock, and explored the optimal heart rate range, in order to provide new insights for clinical treatment of septic shock.

methodsThis retrospective study utilized time-series heart rate data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) IV database. Patients with septic shock were identified as the Sepsis 3.0 criteria and received vasopressor therapy in the first 24 h since ICU admission. We calculated the time-weighted average heart rate (TWA-HR) based on the time-series data. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was employed to investigate the nonlinear relationship between heart rate and 28-day mortality, aiming to explore the optimal heart rate control target for septic patients and using this target as the exposure factor. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcome were ICU and in-hospital mortality. For the original cohort, we applied the log-rank test to infer the relationship between heart rate and mortality. To control for bias introduced by confounders, we utilized propensity score matching (PSM) to reduce imbalances between normal TWA-HR and high TWA-HR groups, and we established a series of models [the multivariable Cox model, matching weight (MW)-adjusted Cox model, multivariable logistic regression, MW-adjusted logistic regression, and doubly robust model] as sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses to demonstrate the robustness of our findings.

resultsA total of 13492 patients were included in our study. The RCS analysis based on Cox and logistic regression showed increased risk of mortality (P < 0.001, non-linear P < 0.001) when TWA-HR > 85 beats per minute (bpm). The log-rank test revealed in terms of the 28-day mortality, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) was 1.92 (1.78-2.06, P < 0.001) for patients with high TWA-HR compared to normal TWA-HR group. Similarly, for the ICU mortality, the HR (95% CI) was 1.64 (1.52-1.78, P < 0.001), and for the in-hospital mortality, the HR (95% CI) was 1.61 (1.48-1.76, P < 0.001). Collectively, the sensitivity analysis consistently demonstrated higher 28-day mortality, ICU mortality, and in-hospital mortality in patients with TWA-HR > 85 bpm.

conclusionPatients with septic shock whose heart rate was controlled no more than 85 bpm during ICU stay received survival benefit in terms of 28-day, ICU and in-hospital mortality. .

Indexed as

Heart RateHospital MortalityIntensive Care UnitsShock, SepticAgedAged, 80 and overCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesHeart rateMIMIC-IVMortalityRestricted cubic splineSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID39354354
PMCPMC11446028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.