ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Abdominal Etching-A Novel Classification Method for Surgical Approach.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe abdomen is the aesthetic and physical center of the body. Abdominal etching is used to enhance the appearance of the abdominal musculature. Body contouring and abdominal etching are popular among both men and women, and these procedures have been shown to result in high patient satisfaction and are considered safe. The aim of this study was to describe a novel classification for abdominal etching based on the senior author's technique and experience.
methodsThis single surgeon, nonrandomized, retrospective study was conducted from December 2016 to September 2022. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on their body habitus, abdominal skin pinch test and skin quality, and the surgical plan was tailored accordingly.
resultsSixty-two patients (42 male) with an average age of 36 years underwent abdominal etching during the study period. Subgrouping included 4 (6.45%) in Class 1, 22 (35.5%) in Class 2, 32 (51.6%) in Class 3 and 4 (6.45%) in Class 4. The most common complication was seroma. Concomitant procedures included silicone implants to the pectoral region (male), fat injection to the buttocks, breast reduction and mastopexy and treatment of post-liposuction irregularities.
conclusionsThe abdominal etching technique is safe and reproducible. It has demonstrated long-lasting results and high patient satisfaction. Our classification of patients will enable surgeons to better understand the problem presented and provide aesthetic and efficient results. Use of these guidelines and tailoring treatment options will further improve patient and physician satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.