Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354154›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025

Clinical factors and predictors for spontaneous separation of epiretinal membranes.

Juseok Lee, Junwon Lee, Christopher Seungkyu Lee, Min Kim, Suk Ho Byeon, Sung Soo Kim, Hyun Goo Kang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spontaneous epiretinal membrane resolution: mechanisms, outcomes, and implications for clinical management.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juseok LeeYonsei University College of Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8593-6438
Junwon LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0543-7132
Christopher Seungkyu LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-Ro 50-1, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5054-9470
Min KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1873-6959
Suk Ho ByeonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-Ro 50-1, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8101-0830
Sung Soo KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-Ro 50-1, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. semekim@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-7993
Hyun Goo KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Severance Eye Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei-Ro 50-1, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. hgkang88@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8359-9618

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute No. HI22C0706Seokchunnanum Foundation No. 2022-31-1372Yonsei University College of Medicine 6-2023-0128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the clinical characteristics, imaging features, and predictive factors for spontaneous separation in patients with idiopathic or secondary ERM.

methodsThe overall cohort was divided into two subgroups: idiopathic ERM (28 eyes, 56%) and secondary ERM (22 eyes, 44%). Electronic records and multimodal imaging were reviewed.

resultsAmong the 50 eyes included in this study, the self-separation of ERM occurred over a mean duration of 28.1 ± 25.3 months (median: 25.4 months). Compared with the secondary ERM group, the idiopathic group had a shorter interval to separation (idiopathic vs. secondary, 23.4 vs. 34.1 months, respectively; P = .01) and better vision at diagnosis (logMAR 0.094 vs. 0.224; P = .009) and after separation (logMAR 0.097 vs. 0.188; P = .01). Overall, in both subgroups, spontaneous ERM separation appeared to have been induced by posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) (P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that the self-separation interval (odds ratio [OR] 0.936) and IRF (OR 0.049) were significantly associated with complete ERM separation (all P < .05). Additionally, secondary ERM (OR 15.224) and lower initial best-corrected visual acuity (OR 267.589) were significantly associated with improvements in vision after self-separation (all P < .05).

conclusionThe self-separation of ERM appears to be induced by PVD development in most eyes. Owing to the possibility of complete spontaneous separation, surgical membrane peeling may be delayed by up to 28 months in eyes without PVD, regardless of whether the cause is idiopathic or secondary. Patients with secondary ERM may experience favorable visual improvement after self-separation despite having poor vision at diagnosis and IRF on OCT. KEY MESSAGES: What is known • An epiretinal membrane (ERM), the most prevalent retinal disease in adults, is less understood regarding clinical factors and the accurate mechanism of spontaneous separation. What is new • The separation of ERM appears to be induced by PVD development in most eyes. • Favorable vision outcomes were associated with secondary ERMs and lower initial visual acuity. • Complete ERM separation was associated with a shorter self-resolution interval and the absence of intraretinal fluid (IRF) in OCT imaging.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneRetinaTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingRemission, SpontaneousRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsVitrectomyEpiretinal membranePosterior vitreous detachmentSpontaneous separation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.