Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354123›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Advanced biomarker clustering analysis reveals mortality predictors in burn patients with sepsis.

Jaechul Yoon, Dohern Kym, Yong Suk Cho, Jun Hur, Dogeon Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Managing skin infections in burn patients: principles and pitfalls.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Longitudinal biomarker trajectories and their prognostic utility for 21-day mortality in burn patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jaechul YoonDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 12, Beodeunaru-ro 7-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07247, Korea.
Dohern KymDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 12, Beodeunaru-ro 7-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07247, Korea. dohern@hallym.or.kr.
Yong Suk ChoDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 12, Beodeunaru-ro 7-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07247, Korea.
Jun HurDepartment of Surgery and Critical Care, Burn Center, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, 12, Beodeunaru-ro 7-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07247, Korea.
Dogeon YoonHangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Burn Institutes, Hallym University Medical Center, 12, Beodeunaru-ro 7-gil, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07247, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of predicting mortality in sepsis among burn patients. Given the heterogeneity of sepsis, especially in the context of burn injuries, this study aims to identify reliable biomarkers for mortality prediction. The study is a retrospective review, focusing on the evaluation of various biomarkers and their changes over time in a burn patient cohort. Conducted in the Burn Intensive Care Unit of Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, the study involved a retrospective review of 1,659 adult burn patients from January 2010 to December 2022. Key biomarkers analyzed include lactate levels, pH, platelets, procalcitonin, and others. Advanced clustering methodologies, such as dynamic time warping and hierarchical clustering, were utilized to classify patients into distinct groups based on their biomarker profiles and clinical outcomes. The study identified four patient clusters with unique lactate level trajectories. Significant findings include the identification of procalcitonin, pH, and platelets as key predictors of mortality, with varying degrees of efficacy across different clusters. For instance, in the "Persistent Rise" cluster, pH and platelet count showed Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.756 and 0.753, respectively, indicating their strong predictive power. The study concludes that a combination of biomarkers, especially lactate dynamics, can effectively predict mortality in burn-induced sepsis. The results advocate for a more personalized approach in managing sepsis in burn patients, considering the specific biomarker trajectories. These findings are crucial for enhancing treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes in burn care.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBurnsSepsisAdultAgedCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedProcalcitoninPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersLactic AcidProcalcitoninBurn patientsClustering analysisLactate DynamicsMortality predictionSepsis

Identifiers

PMID39354123
PMCPMC11445574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.