ArticleScientific reports2024
An optimized instrument variable selection approach to improve causality estimation in association studies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal link between maternal PCOS and fetal/neonatal hemorrhagic and hematological disorders: A 2-sample MR study.Medicine · 2026Article
- Integrative Mendelian randomization and spatial transcriptomics analysis reveals causal links between plasma lipidome and non-small cell lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring the association between 91 circulating inflammatory proteins and the risk of carcinoid syndrome: a Mendelian randomization analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Integrative Machine Learning of Glioma and Coronary Artery Disease Reveals Key Tumour Immunological Links.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mendelian randomization (MR) is an emerging tool for inferring causality in genetic epidemiology. MR studies suffer bias from weak genetic instrument variables (IVs) and horizontal pleiotropy. We introduce a robust integrative framework strictly adhering with STROBE-MR guidelines to improve causality inference through MR studies. We implemented novel t-statistics-based criteria to improve the reliability of selected IVs followed by various MR methods. Further, we include sensitivity analyses to remove horizontal-pleiotropy bias. For functional validation, we perform enrichment analysis of identified causal SNPs. We demonstrate effectiveness of our proposed approach on 5 different MR datasets selected from diverse populations. Our pipeline outperforms its counterpart MR analyses using default parameters on these datasets. Notably, we found a significant association between total cholesterol and coronary artery disease (P = 1.16 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.