Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39354045›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A deep-learning model for characterizing tumor heterogeneity using patient-derived organoids.

Kosuke Takagi, Motoki Takagi, Gen Hiyama, Kazuhito Goda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kosuke TakagiResearch and Development, Advanced Core Technology Japan Unit 2, Evident Corp. Hachioji, 192-0033, Tokyo, Japan.
Motoki TakagiTranslational Research Center, Fukushima Medical University, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan. motokitakagi02@gmail.com.
Gen HiyamaTranslational Research Center, Fukushima Medical University, 960-1295, Fukushima, Japan.
Kazuhito GodaResearch and Development, Advanced Biological Engineering Japan, Evident Corp., 192-0033, Hachioji, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genotypic and phenotypic diversity, which generates heterogeneity during disease evolution, is common in cancer. The identification of features specific to each patient and tumor is central to the development of precision medicine and preclinical studies for cancer treatment. However, the complexity of the disease due to inter- and intratumor heterogeneity increases the difficulty of effective analysis. Here, we introduce a sequential deep learning model, preprocessing to organize the complexity due to heterogeneity, which contrasts with general approaches that apply a single model directly. We characterized morphological heterogeneity using microscopy images of patient-derived organoids (PDOs) and identified gene subsets relevant to distinguishing differences among original tumors. PDOs, which reflect the features of their origins, can be reproduced in large quantities and varieties, contributing to increasing the variation by enhancing their common characteristics, in contrast to those from different origins. This resulted in increased efficiency in the extraction of organoid morphological features sharing the same origin. Linking these tumor-specific morphological features to PDO gene expression data enables the extraction of genes strongly correlated with intertumor differences. The relevance of the selected genes was assessed, and the results suggest potential applications in preclinical studies and personalized clinical care.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeoplasmsOrganoidsGenetic HeterogeneityHumansPrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID39354045
PMCPMC11445485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.