Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353888›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Predicting the first steps of evolution in randomly assembled communities.

John McEnany, Benjamin H Good

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A theory of ecological invasions and its implications for eco-evolutionary dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecological diversification in rapidly evolving populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John McEnanyBiophysics Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Benjamin H GoodDepartment of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. bhgood@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7757-3347

Funding

Molecular Biophysics Training Program at StanfordT32GM136568 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Zev Bryant, KERWYN C. HUANG · 2021 to 2026
$3.7M
Quantitative approaches for mapping the real-time evolution of the gut microbiotaR35GM146949 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Benjamin H Good · 2022 to 2026
$2.0M
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation FG-2021-15708NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM146949NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM136568U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R35GM146949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial communities can self-assemble into highly diverse states with predictable statistical properties. However, these initial states can be disrupted by rapid evolution of the resident strains. When a new mutation arises, it competes for resources with its parent strain and with the other species in the community. This interplay between ecology and evolution is difficult to capture with existing community assembly theory. Here, we introduce a mathematical framework for predicting the first steps of evolution in large randomly assembled communities that compete for substitutable resources. We show how the fitness effects of new mutations and the probability that they coexist with their parent depends on the size of the community, the saturation of its niches, and the metabolic overlap between its members. We find that successful mutations are often able to coexist with their parent strains, even in saturated communities with low niche availability. At the same time, these invading mutants often cause extinctions of metabolically distant species. Our results suggest that even small amounts of evolution can produce distinct genetic signatures in natural microbial communities.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionMutationBacteriaEcosystemMicrobiotaModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID39353888
PMCPMC11445446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.