ArticleNature communications2024
Inferring replication timing and proliferation dynamics from single-cell DNA sequencing data.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prior-guided factorization for reliable imputation of scRNA-seq data.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Modulating Surface Properties and Osteoblast Responses in Bone Regeneration via Positive and Negative Charges during Electrospinning of Poly(l-lactide-ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2026Article
- Spatial mapping of DNA synthesis reveals dynamics and geometry of human replication nanostructures.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Inferring replication timing and proliferation dynamics from single-cell DNA sequencing data.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dysregulated DNA replication is a cause and a consequence of aneuploidy in cancer, yet the interplay between copy number alterations (CNAs), replication timing (RT) and cell cycle dynamics remain understudied in aneuploid tumors. We developed a probabilistic method, PERT, for simultaneous inference of cell-specific replication and copy number states from single-cell whole genome sequencing (scWGS) data. We used PERT to investigate clone-specific RT and proliferation dynamics in >50,000 cells obtained from aneuploid and clonally heterogeneous cell lines, xenografts and primary cancers. We observed bidirectional relationships between RT and CNAs, with CNAs affecting X-inactivation producing the largest RT shifts. Additionally, we found that clone-specific S-phase enrichment positively correlated with ground-truth proliferation rates in genomically stable but not unstable cells. Together, these results demonstrate robust computational identification of S-phase cells from scWGS data, and highlight the importance of RT and cell cycle properties in studying the genomic evolution of aneuploid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.