Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353688›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2024

Genicular artery embolisation versus sham embolisation for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised controlled trial.

Tijmen A van Zadelhoff, P Koen Bos, Adriaan Moelker, Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra, Rianne A van der Heijden, Edwin H G Oei

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03884049 nacompletednot on this map

Novel Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Sham-controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2019 to 2023Enrolled58ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsEmbolization, Sham embolization
NCT07361198 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Percutaneous Transcatheter Genicular Embolization in Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMasarykova Nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, Krajska Zdravotni a.s.Ran2026 to 2029Enrolled20ConditionsOsteoarthritic Knee Pain, Osteo Arthritis of the Knee, OsteoarthitisArmsgenicular artery embolisation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Editorial: Special issue imaging and pain.Osteoarthritis imaging · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tijmen A van ZadelhoffDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands t.vanzadelhoff@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0243-6532
P Koen BosDepartment of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Adriaan MoelkerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Sita M A Bierma-ZeinstraDepartment of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Rianne A van der HeijdenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.
Edwin H G OeiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the efficacy of genicular artery embolisation (GAE) compared with sham GAE for pain reduction in patients with symptomatic mild-to-moderate knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

designDouble-blind randomised sham-controlled clinical trial conducted from June 2019 to December 2021. The follow-up period was 4 months.

settingSingle-centre study conducted at a university medical centre in Rotterdam, Netherlands.

participants58 adults with symptomatic mild-to-moderate KOA not improving with conservative treatment.

interventionsParticipants were randomised to receive either GAE treatment or a sham GAE treatment.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was reduction of pain measured with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale (0-100, with 0 representing the worst pain outcome and 100 the best) after 4 months. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and 1 and 4 months.

resultsFrom June 2019 to December 2021, 58 patients were included. 29 patients were randomised to the GAE group and 29 to the sham group. All participants completed the study. The mean pain reduction after 4 months was 21.4 (95% CI 13.9 to 28.8) for the GAE group and 18.4 points (95% CI 11.6 to 25.1) for the sham group. The between-group difference for the mean pain reduction was 3.0 (95% CI -7.1 to 13.0) with an estimated Cohen's d effect size of d = 0.15 (95% CI -0.37 to 0.66). Group allocation was not a significant contributor to pain reduction (p = 0.31). No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred. 23 mild AEs occurred in the GAE group and 5 in the sham group.

conclusionWe did not establish a clinical effect of GAE in patients with mild-to-moderate KOA as GAE produced a similar effect on pain reduction as a sham GAE procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03884049.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticOsteoarthritis, KneeAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPain MeasurementTreatment Outcomeinterventional radiologykneerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID39353688
PMCPMC11448342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.