Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353677›Full record

ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024

Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II): multicentre, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to Descemet stripping only (DSO) with adjunctive ripasudil for Fuchs dystrophy.

Charles C Lin, Winston Chamberlain, Beth Ann Benetz, William Gensheimer, Jennifer Y Li, Bennie H Jeng, Jameson Clover, Nicole Varnado, Sarah Abdelrahman, Amrita Srinivasan and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05275972 (Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05275972 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trials (DETECT I & II)

TypeinterventionalSponsorStanford UniversityRan2023 to 2028Enrolled60ConditionsFuchs, Fuchs Dystrophy, Fuchs' Endothelial DystrophyArmsRipasudil, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. One year follow up of descemet stripping only: corneal tomography changes and visual acuity outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Charles C LinOphthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Winston ChamberlainOphthalmology, Oregon Health & Science University Casey Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Beth Ann BenetzCorneal Imaging Analysis Reading Center, Case Western Reserve University Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
William GensheimerSection of Ophthalmology, Dartmouth College Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.
Jennifer Y LiDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Bennie H JengSheie Eye Institute at the University of Pennsylavia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jameson CloverVisionGift, Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9682-4941
Nicole VarnadoOphthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Sarah AbdelrahmanF.I. Proctor Foundation at the University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Amrita SrinivasanOphthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Zeba A SyedWills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ellen H KooDepartment of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-2775
Benjamin F ArnoldFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Thomas M LietmanFrancis I. Proctor Foundation, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jonathan LassCorneal Imaging Analysis Reading Center, Case Western Reserve University Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Jennifer Rose-NussbaumerOphthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA rosej@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4905-2528

Funding

Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial (DETECT)UG1EY030417 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ROSE-NUSSBAUMER, JENNIFER · 2021 to 2025
$5.7M
NEI NIH HHS UG1 EY030417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIt remains uncertain whether Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet stripping only (DSO) yields better outcomes in patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing DMEK to DSO with ripasudil (DSO-R) for this patient population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 60 patients with endothelial dysfunction due to symptomatic FECD will be enrolled from seven participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-DMEK plus topical placebo and group 2-DSO plus topical ripasudil 0.4%. The enrolment period is 24 months. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central endothelial cell density, visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. Study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, endothelial failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. DETECT II aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of DMEK and DSO-R. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising the treatment of FECD, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A data and safety monitoring committee has been empanelled by the National Eye Institute. All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record. This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05275972.

Indexed as

Descemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyFuchs' Endothelial DystrophyIsoquinolinesSulfonamidesVisual AcuityAgedDescemet MembraneEndothelium, CornealFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicOphthalmic SolutionsTreatment OutcomeIsoquinolinesK-115Ophthalmic SolutionsSulfonamidesclinical trialcornea

Identifiers

PMID39353677
PMCPMC11459325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.