ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024
Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II): multicentre, outcome assessor-masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) to Descemet stripping only (DSO) with adjunctive ripasudil for Fuchs dystrophy.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05275972 (Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trials), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trials (DETECT I & II)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring corneal endothelial cell dynamics: structure, functions and therapeutic approaches.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Emerging Innovations in the Treatment of Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: A Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- One year follow up of descemet stripping only: corneal tomography changes and visual acuity outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review of the Role of Rho-Kinase Inhibitors in Corneal Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Versus Descemetorhexis Without Keratoplasty (DSO) in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Cell-intrinsic insulin signaling defects in human iPS cell-derived hepatocytes in type 2 diabetes.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIt remains uncertain whether Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet stripping only (DSO) yields better outcomes in patients with symptomatic Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial II (DETECT II), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial comparing DMEK to DSO with ripasudil (DSO-R) for this patient population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 60 patients with endothelial dysfunction due to symptomatic FECD will be enrolled from seven participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-DMEK plus topical placebo and group 2-DSO plus topical ripasudil 0.4%. The enrolment period is 24 months. The primary outcome is best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include peripheral and central endothelial cell density, visual acuity, vision-related quality of life and Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography. Study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, endothelial failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. DETECT II aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of DMEK and DSO-R. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising the treatment of FECD, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A data and safety monitoring committee has been empanelled by the National Eye Institute. All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record. This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05275972.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.