Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353556›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

Social behaviour mediates the microbiome response to antibiotic treatment in a wild mammal.

Bianca R P Brown, Allison E Williams, Kate A Sabey, Aaron Onserio, John Ewoi, Se Jin Song, Rob Knight, Vanessa O Ezenwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Bianca R P BrownDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University , New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3110-5708
Allison E WilliamsOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia , Athens, GA, USA.
Kate A SabeyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia , Athens, GA, USA.
Aaron OnserioMpala Research Centre , Nanyuki, Kenya.
John EwoiMpala Research Centre , Nanyuki, Kenya.
Se Jin SongCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA, USA.
Rob KnightCenter for Microbiome Innovation, University of California San Diego , La Jolla, CA, USA.
Vanessa O EzenwaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University , New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-1913

Funding

National Science FoundationNational Science Foundation IOS-1101836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High levels of social connectivity among group-living animals have been hypothesized to benefit individuals by creating opportunities to rapidly reseed the microbiome and maintain stability against disruption. We tested this hypothesis by perturbing the microbiome of a wild population of Grant's gazelles with an antibiotic and asking whether microbiome recovery differs between individuals with high versus low levels of social connectivity. We found that after treatment, individuals with high social connectivity experienced a faster increase in microbiome richness than less socially connected individuals. Unexpectedly, the rapid increase in microbiome richness of highly connected individuals that received treatment led to their microbiomes becoming more distinct relative to the background population. Our results suggest that the microbiome of individuals with high social connectivity can be rapidly recolonized after a perturbation event, but this leads to a microbiome that is more distinct from, rather than more similar to the unperturbed state. This work provides new insight into the role of social interactions in shaping the microbiome.

Indexed as

AntelopesAnti-Bacterial AgentsMicrobiotaSocial BehaviorAnimalsAnti-Bacterial Agents16S rRNAdegreegazellesocial connectivity

Identifiers

PMID39353556
PMCPMC11444789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.