ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2024
Serologic Evidence for Early SARS-CoV-2 Circulation in Lima, Peru, 2020.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During early 2021, Peru had the highest COVID-19-associated per-capita mortality rate. Socioeconomic inequality, insufficiently prepared healthcare, and surveillance systems are factors explaining the mortality rate, which can be severely worsened by early undetected SARS-CoV-2 circulation. We tested 1,441 individuals with fever sampled during August 2019-May 2021, several months before the first SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence study available so far in Lima, Peru, for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. The testing algorithm included a chemiluminescence immunoassay and surrogate virus neutralization test. Early positive samples (N = 24) from January-March 2020 were further tested using a plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and avidity test against the SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleoprotein. None of the early samples were PRNT-confirmed, in contrast to 81.8% (18/22) of a subsample from April 2020 onward (Fisher exact test; P <0.0001). Therefore, we excluded non-PRNT-confirmed samples from subsequent analyses. The SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection rate was 0.9% in mid-April 2020 (1/104; 95% CI: 0.1-5.8%), suggesting viral circulation in early-middle March 2020, consistent with the first molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru on March 2020. Mean avidity increase of 62-77% to 81-94% from all PRNT-confirmed SARS-CoV-2-positive samples during early 2020 were consistent with onset of SARS-CoV-2 circulation during late February/March 2020. Early circulation was also confirmed in a susceptible, exposed, infected, and recovered mathematical model that calculated an effective reproduction number >1 during February-March 2020. Early introduction of SARS-CoV-2 thus contributed to the high COVID-19 mortality rate in Peru. Emphasizing the role of diagnostic confirmation in understanding the pandemic's trajectory, this study highlights the importance of early detection and accurate testing in managing infectious disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.