Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353337›Full record

ArticleUltrasonics sonochemistry2024

Enhancement of extraction efficiency and functional properties of chickpea protein isolate using pulsed electric field combined with ultrasound treatment.

Xin-Jue Lai, Jian-Quan Chen, Jing Nie, Pei-Feng Guo, Muhammad Faisal Manzoor, Yan-Yan Huang, Jian Li, Song-Yi Lin, Xin-An Zeng, Rui Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Sustainable valorization ofFood chemistry: X · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xin-Jue LaiSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Jian-Quan ChenSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Jing NieSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Pei-Feng GuoSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Muhammad Faisal ManzoorSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Yan-Yan HuangSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China.
Jian LiSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China; School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Song-Yi LinNational Engineering Research Center of Seafood, School of Food Science and Technology, Dalian Polytechnic University, Dalian 116034, China.
Xin-An ZengSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China; School of Food Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China.
Rui WangSchool of Food Science and Engineering, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China. Electronic address: ruiwang@fosu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea protein isolate (CPI) is a promising dietary protein with the advantages of low allergenicity, easy digestion and balanced composition of essential amino acids. However, due to the thick skin of chickpeas, the extraction of CPI is challenging, resulting in lower efficiency of the alkaline extraction-isoelectric precipitation (AE-IEP) method. Therefore, the present study investigated the effect of pulsed electric field combined with ultrasound (PEF-US) treatment on the extraction efficiency of CPI and the functional properties was characterized. Parameter optimization was carried out using response surface methodology (RSM), with the following optimized conditions: pulse duration of 87 s, electric field intensity of 0.9 kV/cm, ultrasonic time of 15 min, and ultrasonic power of 325 W. Under the optimized conditions, the yield of CPI after combined (PEF-US) treatment was 13.52 ± 0.13 %, which was a 47.28 % improvement over the AE-IEP method. This yield was better than that obtained with either individual PEF or US treatment. Additionally, the functional properties (solubility, emulsification, and foaming) of CPI were significantly enhanced compared to AE-IEP. However, the stability of emulsification and foaming did not show significant differences among the four methods. The PEF-US method efficiently extracts CPI with excellent functional properties, enabling the production of proteins as desired functional additives in the food industry.

Indexed as

Chemical FractionationCicerElectricityPlant ProteinsSolubilitySonicationUltrasonic WavesPlant ProteinsChickpea protein isolateFunctional propertiesOptimisationPulsed electric fieldUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39353337
PMCPMC11471670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.