Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353330›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2024

Dilution of broiler breeder diets with oat hulls prolongs feeding but does not affect central control of appetite.

Laura M Dixon, Sarah Brocklehurst, Joe Hills, Simone Foister, Peter W Wilson, Angus M A Reid, Sarah Caughey, Victoria Sandilands, Tim Boswell, Ian C Dunn and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laura M DixonSRUC, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: laura.dixon@sruc.ac.uk.
Sarah BrocklehurstBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.
Joe HillsSRUC, Edinburgh, UK.
Simone FoisterInnovent Technology Ltd, Northern Agri-Tech Innovation Hub, Easter Bush, UK.
Peter W WilsonRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, UK.
Angus M A ReidRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, UK.
Sarah CaugheyRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, UK.
Victoria SandilandsSRUC, Edinburgh, UK.
Tim BoswellCentre for Behavior and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ian C DunnRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, UK.
Rick B D'EathSRUC, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The parents of broiler (meat) chickens (ie, broiler breeders) are food-restricted until sexual maturity, ensuring good health and reproduction, but resulting in hunger. We investigated whether diets with added insoluble fiber promote satiety and reduce behavioral, motivational, and physiological signs of hunger. Ninety-six broiler breeders were fed 1 of 4 feed treatments (n = 24 per diet) from 6 to 12 wk of age: 1) a commercial diet fed to the recommended ration (R) or 2) ad libitum (AL), the same diet as R but mixed with oat hulls at 3) 20% (OH20%) or 4) 40% (OH40%). The R, OH20% and OH40% diets were approximately iso-energetic and resulted in mean 12 wk of age weights within 2.5% of each other (1.21 kg), while AL birds weighed 221% as much (2.67kg). At 12 wk of age, agouti-related protein (AGRP) expression, was, on average, more than 12 times lower in AL birds (P < 0.001) but did not differ between the fiber diet treatments and R. Pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) expression, was, on average, over 1.5 times higher in AL birds, but was not statistically significantly affected by feed treatments (P = 0.33). In their home pens, AL birds stood/sat more, foraged less and fed more in total (P < 0.001) and OH40% birds spent longer feeding than R (P = 0.001). Motivation to forage tested by willingness to walk through water to access an area of wood shavings (without food) was not significantly affected by diet (P = 0.33). However, restricted birds were willing to cross in only 7.3% to 12.5% of tests. Mostly birds stayed on the start platform, where AL birds sat more than other treatments and OH40% birds reduced walking relative to R birds (P = 0.016). Across the behavioral and physiological measurements there was a dichotomy of effects in response to approximately iso-energetic diets differing in fiber. There were some potentially beneficial behavioral effects related to reduced foraging and walking. However, there was no evidence that these diets significantly improved physiological measures of satiety of broiler breeders.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAvenaChickensDietAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAppetiteDietary FiberFemaleMaleRandom AllocationDietary FiberAGRPbehaviorbroiler breederfeed restrictionmotivation

Identifiers

PMID39353330
PMCPMC11464247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.