Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353293›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatric research2024

Using Natural Language Processing to develop risk-tier specific suicide prediction models for Veterans Affairs patients.

Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Brian Shiner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatric research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Life events extraction from healthcare notes for veteran acute suicide risk prediction.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maxwell LevisWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, 215 North Main Street, White River Junction, VT, 05009, USA; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA. Electronic address: maxwelle.levis@va.gov.
Monica DimambroWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, 215 North Main Street, White River Junction, VT, 05009, USA.
Joshua LevyGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
Brian ShinerWhite River Junction VA Medical Center, 215 North Main Street, White River Junction, VT, 05009, USA; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Rope Ferry Rd, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA; National Center for PTSD Executive Division, 215 North Main Street, White River Junction, VT, 05009, USA.

Funding

Using big data to develop universal and selective suicide prevention strategiesIK2CX002630 · VA · WHITE RIVER JUNCTION VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Maxwell Eli Joshua Levis · 2024 to 2027
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX002630Intramural VA VA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suicide is a leading cause of death. Suicide rates are particularly elevated among Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients. While VA has made impactful suicide prevention advances, efforts primarily target high-risk patients with documented suicide risk. This high-risk population accounts for less than 10% of VA patient suicide deaths. We previously evaluated epidemiological patterns among VA patients that had lower classified suicide risk and derived moderate- and low-risk groupings. Expanding upon VA's leading suicide prediction model, this study uses national VA data to refine high-, moderate-, and low-risk specific suicide prediction methods. We selected all VA patients who died by suicide in 2017 or 2018 (n = 4584), matching each case with five controls who remained alive during treatment year and shared suicide risk percentiles. We extracted all sample unstructured electronic health record notes, analyzed them using natural language processing, and applied machine-learning classification algorithms to develop risk-tier-specific predictive models. We calculated area under the curve (AUC) and suicide risk concentration to evaluate predictive accuracy and analyzed derived words.

resultsOur high-risk model (AUC = 0.621 (95% CI: 0.55-0.68)), moderate-risk (AUC = 0.669 (95% CI: 0.64-0.71)), and low-risk (AUC = 0.673 (95% CI: 0.63-0.72)) models offered significant predictive accuracy over VA's leading suicide prediction algorithm. Derived words varied considerably, the high-risk model including chronic condition service words, moderate-risk model including outpatient care, and low-risk model including acute condition care. Study suggests benefit of leveraging unstructured electronic health records and expands prediction resources for non-high-risk suicide decedents, an historically underserved population.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSuicideUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeteransAdultAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentUnited StatesNatural language processingPopulation specificitySuicide risk predictionVeterans

Identifiers

PMID39353293
PMCPMC11531988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.