Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39353188›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2024

Impact of Telemedicine Versus In-Person Pediatric Outpatient Type 1 Diabetes Visits on Immediate Glycemic Control: Retrospective Chart Review.

Christopher Ferber, Steven D Mittelman, Tannaz Moin, Holly Wilhalme, Rebecca Hicks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christopher FerberDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0677-8740
Steven D MittelmanDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2867-1298
Tannaz MoinDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5035-6641
Holly WilhalmeDepartment of Medicine Statistics Core, Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9908-6219
Rebecca HicksDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-971X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and adolescents with type 1 diabetes require frequent outpatient evaluation to assess glucose trends, modify insulin doses, and screen for comorbidities. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) provides a detailed glycemic control assessment. Telemedicine has been increasingly used since the COVID-19 pandemic.

objectiveTo investigate CGM profile parameter improvement immediately following pediatric outpatient diabetes visits and determine if visit modality impacted these metrics, completion of screening laboratory tests, or diabetic emergency occurrence.

methodsA dual-center retrospective review of medical records assessed the CGM metrics time in range and glucose management indicator for pediatric outpatient diabetes visits during 2021. Baseline values were compared with those at 2 and 4 weeks post visit. Rates of completion of screening laboratory tests and diabetic emergencies following visits were determined.

resultsA total of 269 outpatient visits (41.2% telemedicine) were included. Mean time in range increased by 1.63% and 1.35% at 2 and 4 weeks post visit (P=.003 and .01, respectively). Mean glucose management indicator decreased by 0.07% and 0.06% at 2 and 4 weeks post visit (P=.003 and .02, respectively). These improvements in time in range and glucose management indicator were seen across both telemedicine visits and in-person visits without a significant difference. However, patients seen in person were 2.69 times more likely to complete screening laboratory tests (P=.03). Diabetic emergencies occurred too infrequently to analyze.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate an immediate improvement in CGM metrics following outpatient visits, regardless of modality. While statistically significant, the magnitude of these changes was small; hence, multiple visits over time would be required to achieve clinically relevant improvement. However, completion of screening laboratory tests was found to be more likely after visits occurring in person. Therefore, we suggest a hybrid approach that allows patient convenience with telemedicine but also incorporates periodic in-person assessment.

Indexed as

continuous glucose monitoringdiabetesglucose management indicatorpediatricsscreening labstelemedicinetime in rangetype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39353188
PMCPMC11480684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.