ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2024
Nitric Oxide-Releasing Topical Treatments for Cutaneous Melanoma.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blue Light-Mediated Nitric Oxide-Releasing Formulation for the Multimodal Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Decoding Cyclodextrins in Skin Applications: Structure, Mechanisms, and Safety in Cosmetic and Dermatologic Formulations (Part I).International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Catalyst-Free Synthesis of a Mechanically Tailorable, Nitric-Oxide-Releasing Organohydrogel and Its Derived Underwater Superoleophobic Coatings.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer notorious for high levels of drug resistance. Additionally, current treatments such as immunotherapies are often associated with numerous adverse side effects. The use of nitric oxide (NO) may represent an attractive treatment for melanoma due to NO's various anticancer properties, unlikeliness to foster resistance, and limited toxicity toward healthy tissues. The anticancer effects of chemical NO donors have been explored previously but with limited understanding of the needed characteristics for exerting optimal antimelanoma activity. Herein, the in vitro therapeutic efficacy of three macromolecular NO donor systems (i.e., cyclodextrin, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and hyaluronic acid) with tunable NO-release kinetics was explored by evaluating skin permeation along with toxicity against melanoma and healthy skin cells. Cytotoxicity against melanoma cells was dependent on NO payload and not donor identity or NO-release kinetics. In contrast, cytotoxicity against healthy cells was primarily influenced by the macromolecular NO donor, with cyclodextrin- and hyaluronic acid-based NO donors having the highest therapeutic indices. In vitro skin permeation was influenced by both the size and charge of the NO donor, with smaller, more neutral donors resulting in greater permeation. A Pluronic F127 organogel was optimized for the delivery of a cyclodextrin-based NO donor. Delivery of the NO donor in this manner resulted in increased in vitro skin permeation and reduced tumor growth in an in vivo model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.