Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39352912›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Dog-human vocal interactions match dogs' sensory-motor tuning.

Eloïse C Déaux, Théophane Piette, Florence Gaunet, Thierry Legou, Luc Arnal, Anne-Lise Giraud

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eloïse C DéauxDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3150-8267
Théophane PietteDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Florence GaunetAix-Marseille University and CNRS, Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (UMR 7290), Marseille, France.
Thierry LegouAix Marseille University and CNRS, Laboratoire Parole et Langage (UMR 6057), Aix-en-Provence, France.
Luc ArnalUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Pasteur, AP-HP, Inserm, Fondation Pour l'Audition, Institut de l'Audition, IHU reConnect, F-75012 Paris, France.
Anne-Lise GiraudDepartment of Basic Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 51NF40_180888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within species, vocal and auditory systems presumably coevolved to converge on a critical temporal acoustic structure that can be best produced and perceived. While dogs cannot produce articulated sounds, they respond to speech, raising the question as to whether this heterospecific receptive ability could be shaped by exposure to speech or remains bounded by their own sensorimotor capacity. Using acoustic analyses of dog vocalisations, we show that their main production rhythm is slower than the dominant (syllabic) speech rate, and that human-dog-directed speech falls halfway in between. Comparative exploration of neural (electroencephalography) and behavioural responses to speech reveals that comprehension in dogs relies on a slower speech rhythm tracking (delta) than humans' (theta), even though dogs are equally sensitive to speech content and prosody. Thus, the dog audio-motor tuning differs from humans', and we hypothesise that humans may adjust their speech rate to this shared temporal channel as means to improve communication efficacy.

Indexed as

SpeechVocalization, AnimalAcoustic StimulationAdultAnimalsAuditory PerceptionDogsElectroencephalographyFemaleHuman-Animal InteractionHumansMaleSpeech Perception

Identifiers

PMID39352912
PMCPMC11444399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.